Posts Tagged ‘Add new tag’

Good financial advice on a budget

Monday, February 8th, 2010

Posted on Money.com

(Money Magazine) — After a tough 2009, you may be looking for some help in getting 2010 off to the right start financially. Unfortunately, finding objective, affordable, individualized advice from a live person can be a challenge.

Many “financial advisers” are simply brokers who get paid to push products. And while fee-only planners, who don’t earn any commission, may have fewer conflicts, they typically prefer to work on contract with people who are already quite wealthy. Then too, the cost can go well into the thousands per year.

What to do? Below, you’ll find some better ways to get the help you need, no matter what your resources.

For free

What you can get: Answers to basic strategy questions, like “What percentage of my retirement money should be in stocks given my age?”

How to find it: Individuals and firms that offer free advice typically have a vested interest in selling you something. But you may be able to get some limited help from a financial pro with no agenda via your employer.

More than 90% of large companies offer investment education as a benefit, says consulting firm Hewitt Associates. Third-party companies are often contracted for group seminars, and some also have trained advisers who will answer questions by phone. Ask your human resources department whether your firm has such a program and what it provides.

For up to $500

What you can get: Two to three hours with a fee-only planner who charges hourly. It’s enough time to solve one major issue, such as “How much should I save for college?”

How to find it: While advisers that charge this way are in the minority, it’s easy to find them. MyFinancial-Advice.com links you with planners who will answer questions by e-mail or phone for a fee based on an hourly rate of around $150. (You can get a quote before committing.)

Or, if you’d like to meet in person, choose from the 300-plus hourly planners associated with Garrett Planning Network. Gather the relevant paperwork in advance, or you’ll end up paying for more hours than you’d like.

For $500 to $3,000

What you can get: A full financial review and workup. While most fee-only planners get paid on a percentage of assets under management, a large number are willing to provide a comprehensive one-time assessment — on everything from budgeting to real estate to retirement — for a flat fee, says Bill Baldwin, who is the chair of the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors.

How to find it: Start by visiting napfa.org and clicking “Find an Advisor.” Contact three to five planners in your area, explain that you are looking for a one-time financial review, and ask for a quote. It’s likely that many planners will be willing to create a session for you

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The 10 Best Retirement Havens

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Forbes cannot promise retirees “paradise on $30 a day.” Quite the opposite. We promise seniors wishing to move out of the U.S. that they will not find paradise anywhere. Each country is unique–with assets and liabilities–and the key to successful retirement as an ex-pat is carefully matching your own personal priorities and finances to the country that has caught your eye.

To help matters along, Forbes has compiled its own list of the 10 best retirement havens, based on a wide variety of criteria ranging from safety to retiree-friendly visa requirements to decent medical care. The countries on our hit list: Austria, Thailand, Italy, Panama, Ireland, Australia, France, Malaysia, Spain and Canada.

No place is perfect. Some countries rank high in one area but lower in others. Australia is by one well-regarded rating, the Country Brand Index, the most livable place in the world. (For the Country Brand and other rankings, see “Retire At Home Or Abroad?”)But if you plan to return to the U.S. frequently, Australia makes for a long slog. Canada is No. 2 in the Country Brand ratings and certainly convenient for Americans, but its harsh winters are well-known. Italy scores high on quality of life, medical care, and even cost of living and climate for retirees residing in the Southern parts of the country. But its complicated taxes and bureaucracy require patience.

So, the key to any decision: Know yourself and do your homework.

If you’re a sun-worshiper determined to protect your assets from overreaching Western governments, consider countries like Panama or Malaysia.

If you are solidly middle-class with a taste for high culture, then there are pleasant surprises to be found in Europe. Who would have known, for example, that France is so friendly to American retirees? Or consider Ireland. Its top personal income tax rate is 43%. That’s not terribly appealing on the surface, but a couple over 65 is entirely exempt from Irish tax on any income below $59,000.

Are you eager to live abroad but totally tone-deaf to foreign languages? That’s a fine argument for Australia, Ireland or Canada. The key to lowering costs and receiving first-rate medical and other services in foreign countries is the ability to “work the system,” and to do that, you have to speak the local language passably well. Sheila Trifari, an American who had cancer while retired in Paris, says she received excellent medical care precisely because she was fluent in French and could work her way through the local medical establishment.

On the other hand, going totally native can bring on unexpected and powerful bouts of homesickness. Kathleen de Carbuccia, president of the Association of Americans Resident Overseas, recommends that prospective retirees seek out cities, towns or villages where there is an existing American or English-speaking ex-pat community. Fellow ex-pats will be of great help during those inevitable moments when cultures clash, and they’ll perhaps help you see the humor in the situation.

Decent and affordable medical care is a key issue for retirees, of course. Most nations, when a retiree applies for a visa at their consulates, require proof of income, such as private or public pension payments and bank account statements, as well as proof of private medical insurance. They don’t want seniors who haven’t paid into their health care systems to become a burden on the locals who have been paying into the system all their lives.

Don’t panic. Finding coverage is eminently doable, and we have laid out how to go about it.

But listen to Donald Johnson, an 80-year-old American retiree in Paris, when he says, “the largest advantage we have is our health care [in France.] We are not sure we could afford to return to the U.S., where health care costs are completely out of control.” In short, factor the costs of medical care into your overall analysis, because in many cases even the costlier E.U. countries become attractive when the quality and cost of medical care is included in a retiree’s projected budget.

Look for the unexpected snafu in your plans: Most American retirees abroad receive their income in U.S. dollars; their expenses are in a foreign currency. Managing this currency risk is one of the most difficult elements of living abroad, and it is likely to be a growing issue, as we enter a period of prolonged dollar weakness.

So, be wise. If you calculate you’ll have to live month-to-month on your pension and Social Security payments while in a European city, then consider village life, or one of our lower-cost alternatives, like Thailand, where you’ll have enough income to maintain a cash reserve and a fine quality of life. No one, after all, wants to be forced home when the dollar drops 25%, as it can sometimes do in a period of just a couple of years.

But there is a means, on our list, to eliminate even the currency risk, if that is your priority. Exotic Panama, that sunny nation in Central America, gateway between the Pacific and Atlantic oceans, has adopted the U.S. dollar as its official currency. Move there and your assets and liabilities are matched.

So, retire abroad, by all means, for it can be richly rewarding. But do so with eyes wide open. Have you thought of where you would retire? As I leave to Costa Rica for a fishing trip on Wed I will keep a sharp eye out for you as this might be a perfect candidate!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

F.H.A. to Raise Standards for Mortgage Insurance

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

NewTimes.com

By DAVID STREITFELD

Published: January 19, 2010
The Federal Housing Administration, which is supporting the housing market by insuring thousands of new mortgages every day, is expected to announce on Wednesday that it is tightening standards.

Borrowers who get an F.H.A.-insured loan will soon have to pay a higher initial insurance premium. The new premium will be 2.25 percent of the value of the loan, up from 1.75 percent.

Starting this summer, sellers will not be able to offer as much help to buyers to pay their closing costs. The maximum amount of assistance will drop to 3 percent of the value of the property, from the current 6 percent.

Other changes will try to hold lenders who participate in the F.H.A. program more accountable by publicly reporting their performance rankings.

The new measures are aimed at shoring up the agency’s finances while also screening out unprepared borrowers.

For years, the F.H.A. operated largely out of the public view. But it has become a subject of controversy recently even as it has ballooned in size. Some of the agency’s critics want it to tamp down risk by insuring fewer loans; others think it should help the market by insuring even more.

As of December, the F.H.A. was insuring 5.8 million single-family residences that had a total loan balance of $750 billion. More than half a million of the loans were seriously delinquent and heading toward foreclosure.

Many of these troubled loans were made in 2007 and 2008 as the market was plunging. Last fall, the agency said its cash reserves had tumbled to 0.5 percent of its loans outstanding, far below the 2 percent mandated by Congress.

Left largely untouched by the changes is the most controversial aspect of the agency’s program: a provision allowing buyers to make a down payment as low as 3.5 percent. Private lenders these days require at least 15 percent.

Borrowers who want to put the minimum down will now be required to have credit scores of at least 580, a relatively poor figure. Previously, there was no minimum score. But this rule might have little effect. The agency says that in practice, new borrowers already have much higher scores.

F.H.A. critics argue that the agency is allowing people to become homeowners while requiring relatively little of them, which they see as a replay of the poor lending standards that created the housing boom and subsequent decline.

Agency officials have responded by saying that they have adequate safeguards in place to make sure that borrowers are creditworthy, and that these loans are saving the housing market from collapse.

Lou Barnes, a loan officer with Premier Mortgage Group in Colorado who is among those who think the government is not doing enough to support the housing market, said the changes were not unduly restrictive. He noted that the insurance premium was merely returning to its level of a decade ago.

“The F.H.A. has done its best to protect the taxpayer, and the least harm to the credit supply,” Mr. Barnes said.

An industry consultant, Howard Glaser, said that with “the F.H.A. hovering around 40 percent of new loan originations, even small rule changes echo.”

Mr. Glaser, a former official with the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which includes the F.H.A., said that “obtaining credit will be a little more expensive or it may be a little more difficult to qualify” but that the changes were “not enough to have a systemic impact on slowing home buying.”

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Too Small to Fail

Sunday, January 17th, 2010

 

Photo: RLEVANS

You’ve heard of Too Big to Fail, right? Well, this week I want to introduce you to a simple personal budgeting tactic I call Too Small to Fail. Around my house, this dumb little idea helps my family keep our savings on track and, if you want to be hyperbolic about it, prevent financial collapse. (See, it’s the opposite of Too Big to Fail in more ways than one.) Before I explain how it works, let’s look at what’s wrong with a traditional budget.

Budgets ask you to look into the future. People are not good at looking into the future. Just watch a World of Tomorrow filmstrip. Where are my helpful robots? (Zhu Zhu hamsters are not helpful!)

Predictions about money are even less accurate. How much am I going to spend on dining over the next month? Beats the heck out of me. Will we be invited out to dinner? How much money is left after buying groceries? Trying to sit down and write a line item each for groceries, dining, entertainment, and so on is silly. You’ll get the numbers wrong and then feel guilty about it later.

Some people renegotiate their budget over the course of the month. “Okay, we overspent on dining already, so we’ll take some money out of entertainment and skip the movies.” If it’s so negotiable, why write it down in the first place?

I remember my parents making this kind of budget when I was a kid. Once a month, they’d sit at the dining room table and argue. You could see the DON’T COME IN HERE waves from several rooms away. When I grew up and got married, my wife and I adopted the same system, because we didn’t know any better.

Well, not anymore. Too Small to Fail relies on two insights:

1. Budgets make you worry most about small expenses, because those are the negotiable ones. As Michael Rubin put it in a MintLife article last August, budgeting can lead to “relentless focus on minor expenses.” So in our budget, we throw all the small-ticket items into the same category: groceries, dining, entertainment, it’s all the same. If we spend more on dining one week, we spend less on groceries. The total amount in the bucket is important, but the amount spent on each little category isn’t.

To illustrate, our monthly budget (with made-up numbers) looks something like this:

Rent:$100
Phone:$50
Retirement:$25
Vacation fund:$12
Small-ticket items:$30

The numbers are all basically the same from month to month, and as long as it all adds up to less than our monthly income, we’re good.

2. You don’t have to let your boss decide how often you get paid. Have you ever had a job where you were paid monthly? My wife gets a monthly paycheck. I don’t know about you, but I am incapable of making any sum of money last a whole month. Remember Brewster’s Millions? I could have blown the $30 mil in two weeks.

Instead, why not pay yourself weekly? That’s how we do it. We pay ourselves a lump sum every Friday to be used for our daily expenses. (Monthly, nonnegotiable items like rent and utilities come out of a separate account.) Because the money only has to last a week, it’s hard for us to get into much trouble. Sure enough, every week, we spend most of our allowance in the first three days. But then there are only four days left. If we run out of cash on Wednesday and have to raid the pasta drawer for a couple of days, big deal.

I know, this sounds anal and artificial. It is. It’s also effective. Ramit Sethi, author of I Will Teach You to Be Rich, advises you to use barriers to prevent yourself from spending. The classic example is freezing your credit card in a block of ice. This is the same idea: I’m not really out of money when the weekly allowance is spent. But to get more money, I’d have to dip into another account. That’s enough of a barrier to make me slap my own hand and say, “Don’t do that.”

You could even pay yourself twice a week. Or you could use this system to give a separate allowance to yourself and your partner.

If you want to give this a try, start right after you deposit your next paycheck. How much should you pay yourself? It’ll probably take several weeks to figure it out. You’re not trying to put yourself on an austerity program—though if you’re in need of an austerity program, this is a good way to implement it. You want an amount that will cover all of your expenses for the week, but not so much that you’re outspending your income or failing to leave yourself enough to pay your monthly bills.

What about big-ticket items like a new computer or holiday gifts? We save for those, a few dollars a week, over the course of the year.

Too Small to Fail lets you have fun by spending all your money every week. Only you and your helpful robot have to know that you’re being fiscally responsible at the same time.

Matthew Amster-Burton, author of the book Hungry Monkey, writes on food and finance from his home in Seattle.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Text donations raise $7M for Red Cross Haiti effort

Saturday, January 16th, 2010

This is truly remarkable!!

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Donations via text message raised $7 million for the American Red Cross’s Haiti relief efforts as of 11 p.m. Thursday.

Soon after a 7.0-magnitude quake struck near capital city Port-au-Prince late Tuesday, the Red Cross mobilized fundraising efforts via social networking site Twitter. Just before midnight, @RedCross tweeted: “You can text “HAITI” to 90999 to donate $10 to Red Cross relief efforts in #haiti.”

And so far a staggering 700,000 customers have done just that, across all wireless networks including AT&T (T, Fortune 500), Verizon (VZ, Fortune 500), Sprint (S, Fortune 500) and T-Mobile.

“These are donors who are typically the hardest to reach: young people,” said Verizon Wireless spokesman Jeffrey Nelson. “They’re reacting to something that affects them and realizing their few dollars can make a difference. Texting has opened up a whole new world for philanthropy.”

Mobile giving isn’t new, but it’s been in the spotlight since the Haiti earthquake hit. In fact, the $5 million that’s been raised so far by the Red Cross far exceeds the nearly $4 million that was donated to all charities by mobile texts in all of 2009, Nelson said.

Organizations including the ASPCA, Feed the Children and World Land Trust all have 5-digit numbers to which subscribers can text donations at any time.

Nelson said Verizon Wireless (VZ, Fortune 500) has a long-standing policy that it does not charge subscribers for texts to make charitable donations, and added that 100% of the donated funds are passed on to the Red Cross. T-Mobile also said its subscribers can text Haiti donations for free.

News reports earlier Thursday said AT&T (T, Fortune 500) was charging subscribers for their texts. But a spokesman said Thursday afternoon that the company had updated its systems in the morning to make texts sent to Haiti relief efforts free of charge, and that the change would cover those who donated yesterday.

On Thursday afternoon Sprint said it will continue to treat donation texts “like any other text message for now,” but by that evening the company did an about face and said it would issue a waiver on text message fees for specific Haiti mobile giving donations.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

10 Odd Places to Pull Out the Plastic

Saturday, January 16th, 2010

During the construction of his new home, Braun Mincher pulled out the plastic for every new expense. “The contractor didn’t accept plastic, but we had a ‘cost plus’ contract. I was free to directly buy all of the materials. So I used the credit card for appliances, lumber, fixtures, carpet, etc.,” says Mincher, an author, filmmaker, and founder of Braun Media in Fort Collins, Colorado. He then paid off his cards monthly with his own funds or with an advance from the construction loan. The motivation? The consumer protections credit cards offer under federal law and convenience. “I got travel rewards and an easy-to-reconcile bill.”

Mincher generally pays his credit card balances in full every month which makes him feel comfortable using plastic to buy just about everything including a new engine for his small plane, diamonds, office furniture, a home theater, cars, and Lasik eye surgery. He even used credit cards in the early days of his business to make payroll when times were tight.

While Mincher may have the luxury of giving his credit card more of a workout than most cardholders, the perks of some credit cards are prompting people to develop creative ways to use their own plastic beyond the mall and gas station. Here are some other unusual or surprising places where you can pay with plastic.

Construction Site

While your contractor may not accept plastic, you can use a credit card to pay for building materials like lumber, cement, and bricks. In many places, you can charge building permits and other construction-related fees.

Maternity Ward

Charge everything from the delivery room to obstetrician bills (and even those celebratory cigars). Later, use the reward points to spring for a well-deserved getaway.

Adoption Agency

Bundle of joy arriving via adoption? Use a credit card to cover the agency/attorney fees involved. “Typical adoption fees paid to an agency would be between $15,000 and $30,000,” says Nicole Witt, executive director of The Adoption Consultancy. While birth mother expense normally go into an escrow account and are paid to the provider as needed, “legal finalizations costs could be charged, as could any medical expenses such as co-pays and lab tests for the birth mother. And you can use a credit card to cover things like travel.”

Sex Therapist’s Office

Like other types of therapists, most sex therapists accept plastic as payment for appointments and related care. Expanding on the adult theme, credit cards are also welcome at many massage parlors, adult toy stores, and gentlemen’s clubs.

Tuition Office

Virtually all colleges accept plastic for tuition payments. Suggestion: Choose a card that earns frequent flyer miles and you can get free tickets for junior to jet home for the weekend. Got a younger child? Credit is accepted at many daycares, pre-schools, and private elementary/secondary schools, too.

Jail

Thanks to services like Government Payment Service, Inc., more than 1,200 government agencies in over 33 states are now accepting payments from credit or debit cards. Residents in many areas can avoid a night in the slammer by using plastic to pay bail 24 hours a day, seven days a week – even when the banks are closed and the clerk has gone home for the night.

Funeral Home

Whether pre-paying expenses for yourself or covering the costs for a loved one’s arrangements, you can pay for virtually the entire funeral process on plastic, from will preparation to cremation to funeral home fees. If you haven’t made prior arrangements and don’t have sufficient life/funeral insurance coverage, your only option may be a credit card or applying for a loan through the funeral home.

IRS

When you owe the government money, they want it paid yesterday. The Internal Revenue Service offers installment payment plans, but they come with interest and penalties until you pay in full. If you have a credit card with an introductory no- or low-interest period, using that card to pay Uncle Sam would be a money-saving alternative (assuming you can pay the card off before incurring any interest). Many local and state tax departments also accept payment in the form of plastic.

Car Loan or Home Mortgage

Ken Clark, a certified financial planner and author of “The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Getting Out of Debt,” has seen many people pull out the plastic for the down payment on a new car or house. “The charges don’t hit your credit score until after the loan is completed,” he says.

Church Collections Plate

Want to support your church, but short on cold, hard cash? Some churches will accept plastic, either directly at the house of worship or through processing services like MyChurchDonations.com or HolyProcessing.com.

But, Buyer Beware

Your choices of places to use plastic might seem limitless, but that doesn’t mean you should just spontaneously yell, “Charge it!” anytime the mood strikes. “Remember, most people use credit cards to pay for something when they’re tight on money,” Clark says. “But then again, if you’re tight on money, you should probably ask yourself if you can truly afford it in the first place. Consider ‘sleeping on it’ until your next paycheck and reevaluating the purchase when you actually have funds in your account.”

10 Odd Places to Pull Out the Plastic is provided by Experian.com

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

How to Set Up a College Fund

Thursday, January 14th, 2010

Check out this easy steps found on ModernMom.com

If you have kids these steps might be a great guide. Another great way of getting info on these different college plans is to call us and we would be more than glad to walk you thru your options! It’s that easy!

One way to fund your child’s college education is to contribute to a 529 savings plan. While each state now operates at least one of these education savings plans, students can usually attend a college anywhere in the U.S. Although a 529 savings plan is designed similar to a 401(k) or IRA, the specific features and benefits vary among states. To get the most out of your investment and gain the maximum benefit these plans offer, it is important to understand how they work.

  1. Step 1

    Estimate your child’s probable college costs. Inquire about the current annual costs for tuition and fees at several state and private colleges (see Resources below). Factors to consider include what percentage of these costs you want your investment savings to cover, as well as whether you want to reach your savings goal by the time your child enters or graduates from college. How much you need to save also will be based on how much costs are expected to rise annually. Statistical data compiled by the College Board following a 2003-2004 survey show that tuition at four-year colleges has been rising at about a rate of about 6% each year (see Reference 3).

  2. Step 2

    Assess how much investment risk you can afford to take. This will help you set your savings goals and find the right plan. Unless you are in a financial position to take more risk to earn higher returns, you might want to invest your child’s savings more conservatively. If you do invest in riskier options, the time to do it is while your child is younger so that you still have time to recoup any losses.

  3. Step 3

    Enroll in a 529 plan in either your home state or another (see Resources below). While you are given the choice of investing in different options, compare the plans offered by different states. You can enroll directly through the state’s plan manager or hire a financial adviser. Whether you hire a financial planner, broker, finance attorney or CPA to help you create and manage a diversified investment portfolio, choose someone who will provide the financial guidance you need. The person’s education, training and number of years experience are important factors to consider.

  4. Step 4

    Decide what percentage of your assets to invest in each of the fund options you choose for your investment portfolio. If your child will be going off to college within the next two or three years, you might not want to invest in the stock market in the event that you lose money and do not have the time to make it up. A wiser option would be to keep the assets in cash so that you can liquidate them quickly. On the other hand, if your child is still very young, consider investing in the stock market in an effort to earn higher returns.

  5. Step 5

    Invest primarily in bonds if your child will be of college age sometime between the next three to eight years. But no matter what type of investment options you choose, be sure to diversify your portfolio. Never put all your money in a single investment option.

  6. Step 6

    Review the performance of your investment portfolio annually. As your child gets closer to college age, be sure that your investments are yielding enough returns to meet your financial goals. Take a careful look at the quarterly reports. If an investment is not performing the way you expected, consider making some changes. Keep in mind that with a 529 plan you can change investments just once each year.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Economizer Debit-card debate: Use a PIN or sign? Either way it will cost you

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

Very good debate here….Use Pin or Sign???? What’s your opinion?

Some of us do it every day: We swipe our debit card then either sign our name or enter a PIN number — and (voila!) the purchase is done. But little do consumers know that when they sign for a purchase they are costing retailers significantly more than if they enter their PIN — a fact that could end up costing consumers in the end.

According to a recent New York Times report, banks and retailers are enmeshed in a tug of war regarding debit-based fees. It turns out that when a customer signs for a purchase using their debit card, the retailer pays the bank almost twice as much in “interchange fees” than they would if they had entered a PIN instead. Visa, in particular, has built a dominant position in the debit-card market by steadily increasing the rates it charges merchants when a customer makes a purchase with their debit card. Those fees, which the Times says averages 1% to 3% of each transaction, are then passed along to the bank that issues the card. The fees can really add up: interchange fees account for $45 billion in revenue, the newspaper says.
If the retailer is the one stuck with the tab, why should consumers care? Because this behind-the-scenes wrangling can eventually impact their bottom-line, too. Retail-industry trade groups say these fees drive up prices for all customers, not just those paying with plastic.

“Consumers don’t even know they’re being subtly manipulated,” says Russ Haven, legislative counsel for consumer advocacy group NYPIRG. “Every time you engage in a transaction, there are winners and losers.”

In this case, the winners are undoubtedly the banks. No matter how you complete a debit transaction, the banks get paid. But they get paid more if you sign rather than enter your PIN number.

Guess what the banks want you to do? Well if it’s not clear, take a look at the numerous bank rewards programs out there that are being offered to consumers who sign for their debit purchases.

So does this mean you should always choose to enter your PIN because it costs the store less? Not so fast. Banks have come up with a stick to match the carrot of debit-signature reward programs: Many of them charge you for the privilege of paying with a PIN-based transaction.

According to recent research conducted by NYPIRG, between one-quarter and one-third of banks in New York state charge customers a fee of between 35 cents and $1 per PIN-based debit transactions. Russ Haven says this figure most likely holds true for banks elsewhere in the country, as well.

Even though the fees being charged may not seem to amount to much, they more than make up for the money banks would have made if you signed for your purchase instead of entering your PIN. According to the Times, these fees are fractions of a penny for every dollar you spend. If you pay an entire dollar for the privilege of entering your PIN number to buy an inexpensive item like a cup of coffee, not only are you out a buck, but the bank just hit the jackpot.

To find out whether your bank charges you for PIN-based debit purchase, look at your statement or ask to see the bank’s schedule of fees. If they’re on the up and up and don’t charge a fee, enter that PIN all you like. If they do charge, there’s no reason to enrich them further by making PIN-based transactions.

Source

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]