Archive for the ‘Retirement’ Category

The 10 Best Retirement Havens

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Forbes cannot promise retirees “paradise on $30 a day.” Quite the opposite. We promise seniors wishing to move out of the U.S. that they will not find paradise anywhere. Each country is unique–with assets and liabilities–and the key to successful retirement as an ex-pat is carefully matching your own personal priorities and finances to the country that has caught your eye.

To help matters along, Forbes has compiled its own list of the 10 best retirement havens, based on a wide variety of criteria ranging from safety to retiree-friendly visa requirements to decent medical care. The countries on our hit list: Austria, Thailand, Italy, Panama, Ireland, Australia, France, Malaysia, Spain and Canada.

No place is perfect. Some countries rank high in one area but lower in others. Australia is by one well-regarded rating, the Country Brand Index, the most livable place in the world. (For the Country Brand and other rankings, see “Retire At Home Or Abroad?”)But if you plan to return to the U.S. frequently, Australia makes for a long slog. Canada is No. 2 in the Country Brand ratings and certainly convenient for Americans, but its harsh winters are well-known. Italy scores high on quality of life, medical care, and even cost of living and climate for retirees residing in the Southern parts of the country. But its complicated taxes and bureaucracy require patience.

So, the key to any decision: Know yourself and do your homework.

If you’re a sun-worshiper determined to protect your assets from overreaching Western governments, consider countries like Panama or Malaysia.

If you are solidly middle-class with a taste for high culture, then there are pleasant surprises to be found in Europe. Who would have known, for example, that France is so friendly to American retirees? Or consider Ireland. Its top personal income tax rate is 43%. That’s not terribly appealing on the surface, but a couple over 65 is entirely exempt from Irish tax on any income below $59,000.

Are you eager to live abroad but totally tone-deaf to foreign languages? That’s a fine argument for Australia, Ireland or Canada. The key to lowering costs and receiving first-rate medical and other services in foreign countries is the ability to “work the system,” and to do that, you have to speak the local language passably well. Sheila Trifari, an American who had cancer while retired in Paris, says she received excellent medical care precisely because she was fluent in French and could work her way through the local medical establishment.

On the other hand, going totally native can bring on unexpected and powerful bouts of homesickness. Kathleen de Carbuccia, president of the Association of Americans Resident Overseas, recommends that prospective retirees seek out cities, towns or villages where there is an existing American or English-speaking ex-pat community. Fellow ex-pats will be of great help during those inevitable moments when cultures clash, and they’ll perhaps help you see the humor in the situation.

Decent and affordable medical care is a key issue for retirees, of course. Most nations, when a retiree applies for a visa at their consulates, require proof of income, such as private or public pension payments and bank account statements, as well as proof of private medical insurance. They don’t want seniors who haven’t paid into their health care systems to become a burden on the locals who have been paying into the system all their lives.

Don’t panic. Finding coverage is eminently doable, and we have laid out how to go about it.

But listen to Donald Johnson, an 80-year-old American retiree in Paris, when he says, “the largest advantage we have is our health care [in France.] We are not sure we could afford to return to the U.S., where health care costs are completely out of control.” In short, factor the costs of medical care into your overall analysis, because in many cases even the costlier E.U. countries become attractive when the quality and cost of medical care is included in a retiree’s projected budget.

Look for the unexpected snafu in your plans: Most American retirees abroad receive their income in U.S. dollars; their expenses are in a foreign currency. Managing this currency risk is one of the most difficult elements of living abroad, and it is likely to be a growing issue, as we enter a period of prolonged dollar weakness.

So, be wise. If you calculate you’ll have to live month-to-month on your pension and Social Security payments while in a European city, then consider village life, or one of our lower-cost alternatives, like Thailand, where you’ll have enough income to maintain a cash reserve and a fine quality of life. No one, after all, wants to be forced home when the dollar drops 25%, as it can sometimes do in a period of just a couple of years.

But there is a means, on our list, to eliminate even the currency risk, if that is your priority. Exotic Panama, that sunny nation in Central America, gateway between the Pacific and Atlantic oceans, has adopted the U.S. dollar as its official currency. Move there and your assets and liabilities are matched.

So, retire abroad, by all means, for it can be richly rewarding. But do so with eyes wide open. Have you thought of where you would retire? As I leave to Costa Rica for a fishing trip on Wed I will keep a sharp eye out for you as this might be a perfect candidate!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Portfolio makeover: Can I retire early?

Saturday, January 9th, 2010

Here is a quick example of a portfolio makeover….how is your portfolio doing? Can you retire early?? Check out this and see how your retirement portfolio compares.

Kevin and Janice Ford, 51 and 50, automotive plant manager and business consultant, Northville, Mich.

By Donna Rosato, Money Magazine senior writerJanuary 5, 2010: 8:25 AM ET

 

(Money Magazine) — Kevin Ford has worked as an engineer in the Detroit auto industry for more than three decades – currently for the car company that best suits his name. His wife, Janice, is also a veteran of the field, a fellow engineer who even ran her own dealership for a few years before leaving the industry in 2005 to do part-time business development consulting.

Kevin hoped to follow her into retirement at age 55, and two years ago that seemed doable. The family had nearly $1 million saved, plus a hefty pension; they had no debt besides a $300,000 mortgage; their son, Darrell, was out of college and daughter, Kimberly, would be done in 2011.

Then came the great crash of ‘08. “With the losses in the market, I was certain my retirement was pushed back 10 years,” says Kevin. But last year’s rebound has revived his portfolio and his dream: Is it once again realistic?

What the planner says

It’ll be difficult for Kevin to realize his dream of retiring in four years, especially given the family’s future plans to build a custom home in Virginia and renovate their lake-front summer cottage in Michigan, says financial planner Sam Fawaz of Canton, Mich. Figuring in those goals, Fawaz estimates that the Fords will need $1.2 million, alongside pension and Social Security, to sustain 40 years of retirement. They currently have $882,000 with other investment accounts, and are saving $21,000 a year for retirement, including catch-up contributions allowed for people age 50 and older.

While they could hit their target by socking away another $30,000 a year until Kevin retires, that would be a stretch since they’re still paying college bills for Kimberly. And while Kevin’s pension – $65,000 a year at 55 – allows him to invest more aggressively than most people his age, he shouldn’t go above his current 65% stock allocation, given the short time horizon and the uncertainty of his industry. All that said, some smart portfolio moves could give the Fords a shot – albeit slim – of getting to $1.2 million by the time Kevin is 55, says Fawaz.

What they should do

GO ABROAD. The Fords’ portfolio is heavily weighted toward U.S. large-cap stocks. But foreign stocks are expected to grow faster in coming years than their domestic counterparts, says Fawaz. Kevin and Janice should take advantage by putting 13% in small- and midcap international funds, like T. Rowe Price International Discovery (PRIDX).

DUMP COMPANY STOCK. About 8% of Kevin’s 401(k) is in Ford Motor Co. (F, Fortune 500) stock. Investing in any single stock is risky, but this one’s a doozy. The company is his employer; it’s his pension provider, and it’s in an industry that’s in ill health. Kevin should scale back to less than 5%, says Fawaz.

PUT CASH TO WORK. The Fords have 35% of their portfolio in cash. Fawaz recommends moving two-thirds of it to a high-quality short-term bond fund, as such funds typically have better returns without a lot more risk for long-term investors. One good, low-cost option: Vanguard’s Short-Term Federal (VSGBX) fund.

BE FLEXIBLE. If the portfolio doesn’t reach $1.2 million by 2013, Kevin could delay retirement or work part-time (he’d be interested in teaching at a community college). To top of page

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

When do I need to start investing for my retirement?

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009

NOW NOW NOW!!!!! Have you spoken to a financial advisor yet? What are you waiting for, OLD AGE?

We get it: Retirement is just about the last thing on your mind when you’re in your 20s. However, starting to invest for retirement as soon as you finish school and begin earning income is a brilliant financial move. The reason is a magical little thing called compounding. It’s what happens when your interest keeps earning interest, year after year.

If you start early, the effects of compounding can be huge. For example, suppose you start setting aside $1,000 a year (about $19 a week) when you’re 25. You put it in a retirement account earning 8% a year. Even if you stop investing completely when you turn 35 – that is, you’ve invested for only 10 years – your total investment will have grown to nearly $169,000 by the time you turn 65 and are ready to retire. That’s right: A $10,000 investment turns into $169,000.

OK, here’s where it gets really interesting. Let’s say you do the same exact thing, but you don’t start investing the $1,000 a year until you turn 35. And you keep on investing that much every single year until you turn 65. That is, you invest $1,000 a year for 30 years, rather than for 10 years as in the previous example. How much do you wind up with when you’re 65? Only about $125,000. That’s right: Even though you invest three times as much money, you wind up with less.

The earlier you start investing, the more you can benefit from compounding. That’s why you need to get going as soon as possible.

Posted on CNNMoney.com

 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]